Business

Physicians protest N.C. Blues contract change

Doctors believe the plan was trying to preempt a law barring unilateral changes that will take effect in January 2010.

By Emily Berry — Posted Nov. 24, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina has backed away from a contract addendum it sent to physicians in September, a move that follows objections raised by the North Carolina Medical Society and others.

But it's unclear whether a new draft will assuage physician concerns.

The medical society, the North Carolina Blues and the state insurance commissioner were planning to meet in late November to discuss the plan's proposed contract changes, but as of Nov. 12, the medical society hadn't seen a draft of the agreement.

The state's medical society, along with the North Carolina Medical Group Managers Assn., the North Carolina Academy of Family Physicians and the North Carolina Society of Anesthesiologists, wrote a letter to state Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin Oct. 26 asking him to intervene to protect doctors from the changes the Blues plan proposed in September (link).

The groups said they believe the changes were made to avoid provisions of a new contracting law set to take effect Jan. 1, 2010.

According to the physicians' letter, the addendum said the Blues could change doctors' fee schedules whenever the plan wanted, and that doctors would be terminated from the network if they objected.

A law signed July 17 by Gov. Bev Perdue requires health insurers to notify physicians of changes to their contracts. It gives doctors the option to object to the changes and terminate the contract if they wish.

NCMS spokesman Mike Edwards said the medical society was told later that the North Carolina Blues withdrew its original addendum, and that Goodwin, the Blues and the medical society were searching for a meeting date to discuss details of the new draft.

The insurance commissioner has the authority to accept or reject insurers' contract revisions.

In an e-mailed statement, North Carolina Blues spokeswoman Kimberley Colvin said, "BCBSNC was in full compliance with our negotiated provider contract agreement and already complies with most of these provisions in the new legislation, but has amended its contracts to ensure compliance with this new legislation."

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn