Business

FTC investigating CVS Caremark business practices

The agency is focusing on whether the pharmacy benefit management division might be steering patient transactions solely to the company's stores.

By Pamela Lewis Dolan — Posted Nov. 25, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Federal Trade Commission is examining the business dealings of CVS Caremark after getting complaints from several congressmen, pharmacists and patients.

At the heart of the complaints is the 2007 merger between CVS and the pharmacy benefit manager Caremark. Critics say the merger may have resulted in a conflict of interest. The FTC was asked to investigate claims that the Caremark branch of the business was making it hard for its members to buy prescription drugs from non-CVS pharmacies.

In a statement e-mailed to American Medical News, CVS Caremark acknowledged that it was being investigated but refuted the claims.

"The company is not able to predict with certainty the timing, outcome or consequence of the investigation," wrote spokeswoman Carolyn Castel. "However, it remains confident that its business practices and service offerings (which are designed to reduce health care costs and expand consumer choice) are being conducted in compliance with the antitrust laws."

The National Community Pharmacists Assn., which represents independent and small pharmacies, said it supports the investigation.

"Patients consistently complain of higher prices, fewer choices and privacy violations. Patients cite steep penalties for choosing other pharmacies, if they're allowed a choice at all. Aggressive marketing tactics tap into vast databases of private medical records. Meaningful competition has been severely diminished," the NCPA said in its statement.

The NCPA said it documented more than 300 complaints from patients and pharmacists about the company's business practices.

CVS and Caremark merged in 2007 in a deal worth $27 billion. CVS operates more than 6,200 pharmacies across the country, while Caremark manages the pharmacy benefits of more than 130 million people. In a letter to the FTC asking for an investigation, U.S. Rep. Larry Kissell (D, N.C.) said he wanted to know if the merger "has led to significant harm to consumers and small businesses."

Kissell was among several members of Congress who wrote letters asking the FTC to investigate the merger.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn