Business

Independent but not alone (MGMA annual meeting)

How can a small medical practice get the support of large health networks and big institutions but still maintain autonomy? Here are some suggestions.

By Victoria Stagg Elliott — Posted Dec. 7, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The pressure of declining reimbursements combined with the increasing cost of running a small or solo medical practice has many physicians thinking about merging with other practices to stay financially viable.

Experts say, however, that independence does not have to be completely sacrificed. Strategies for linking, affiliating or otherwise integrating with larger entities while maintaining at least some autonomy were the focus of numerous sessions at October's Medical Group Management Assn. meeting in Denver.

"Clearly, physicians and hospitals are trying to be smart about their relationship for the future," said Sara M. Larch, vice president of physician services for Inova Health System in Falls Church, Va.

"We're looking at different models and other ways we can partner successfully."

Some options have long been on the table, but, in an era of declining revenues, are getting a closer look. MGMA's most recent data, released Oct. 1, showed a 7.8% decline in practice revenues per full-time group practice doctor in 2008.

Experts advise that practices examine what they are looking to gain from connecting with hospitals or physician groups before deciding how to do so. Those advocating integration all say that partnering with another entity can improve reimbursement, create economies of scale and improve the ability to retain and recruit physicians. But it is important to choose a structure that fits the practice and the community.

"Every market is different. Health care is local," said Lee B. Sacks, MD, president of Advocate Physician Partners, a physician-hospital organization in the Chicago area.

"Nine out of 10 Americans get some or all of their care from small or solo practices. How can we move ahead without waiting for dramatic changes in reimbursement?" asked Dr. Sacks, who also is executive vice president of Advocate Health Care, which runs numerous hospitals and health facilities.

What's out there

One option for medical practices includes having a managed service organization run by a hospital or other entity handle human resources and administrative tasks.

"It can be the first step towards other models, but it doesn't have to be," said Nick Fabrizio, PhD, a principal with MGMA's health care consulting group.

Practices would have to give up control of billing and other services. This could allow more focus on clinical care. The downside: the MSO might not be able to collect the same percentage of bills, and, if that company goes under, another would have to be found.

Another option is limited or "divisional" mergers, where a small practice maintains its core identity but comes together with other practices to form one corporation. The various "divisions" or practice groups make recommendations on compensation and hiring and generally run themselves. A parent board is ultimately responsible for decisions, but only a supermajority may overturn a division's recommendation.

"I call it 'merger light.' You create a new entity and each division more or less continues to operate as they always have," said David M. Glaser, an attorney with Minneapolis-based Fredrikson & Byron. "The minus is that if one division incurs some liabilities, such as malpractice or sexual harassment, the other divisions are on the hook for it."

Other potential drawbacks are the risk of clashing with antitrust regulation if the new company has more than 40% of the market. Anecdotal evidence also suggests that overhead can grow disproportionably as the number of physicians increases.

In another model, the physician-hospital organization, money matters are handled jointly, and support is provided to improve quality. This type of care model has become increasingly popular over the past couple of decades.

"Ultimately, physicians want to join your group. ... You have a real impact on your marketplace, and you improve outcomes in your communities," said Advocate's Dr. Sacks. According to his presentation at the MGMA meeting, the structure of Advocate Physician Partners allows small practices to collaborate more closely with each other clinically. Claims can be processed less expensively, and help is provided to establish electronic medical records.

Affiliated doctors can be members of other independent practice associations. Approximately 5,200 doctors are on staff at Advocate Health Care facilities. Of those, 3,400 are members of Advocate Physician Partners, with 800 directly employed.

The average size of a practice in the organization is 2.5 physicians.

"We have to earn the trust and confidence of the physicians so they stay with us," said Mark Shields, MD, senior medical director with Advocate Physician Partners. "And we have to minimize the administrative expenses. What goes into administration cannot go to the doctors. We're bringing a lot of infrastructure, especially to these small practices." He is also vice president of medical management with Advocate Health Care.

Possible challenges associated with becoming a member include the need to meet Advocate's clinical integration measures as well as safety and outcome standards, although physicians are, for the most part, have latitude on how to do that.

Other sessions at the meeting focused on the legal limitations on how physicians can relate with one another, other practices, hospitals and health systems.

The American Medical Association has numerous policies calling for antitrust reform that would allow physicians greater flexibility in joint negotiation arrangements. Experts say various collaborative structures, in order to avoid legal trouble, still must do more than just negotiate with payers.

"There's a whole bunch of [IPAs] that are not worth anything and are illegal because they negotiate contracts but they are not willing to become economically or clinically integrated," said Bruce A. Johnson, a partner with law firm Faegre & Benson in Denver. "If you are not willing to do that, you can be accused of being a price-fixing conspiracy."

Other situations to avoid include establishing groups so large that they would constitute a monopoly or any appearance of payment for referrals. Any money that does change hands must be at "fair market value."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Physicians should prepare practices for health system reform

The specifics of health system reform remain to be confirmed, but practice management experts giving presentations at the Medical Group Management Assn. meeting in Denver Oct. 11-14 say physicians already should be thinking about how their practices may need to change.

"We are undergoing the most expensive and most extensive overhaul of our health system ever attempted," said William Jessee, MD, MGMA's president and CEO.

Experts say no action is needed yet. But they advocate that doctors should think about how practices would respond to the most likely outcomes of currently discussed reform bills.

"We can be sure that more people will have health insurance," said David Gans, MGMA's vice president of innovation and research.

"Some will have no experience with the insurance system, and they will be coming into your practice with insurance. ... And many of these insurance programs are high-deductible plans for people who have no idea how to deal with deductibles. How are you going to counsel that patient?"

The Affordable Health Care for America Act, passed Nov. 7 by the U.S. House of Representatives, is projected to cover 96% of the nation's population through a combination of mandates and subsidies. The bill was supported by several medical organizations, including the MGMA and the American Medical Association, which also has continued calls for Medicare payment reform.

While managing the extra patient demand will be challenging, experts say, much already has been learned from the experience of Massachusetts, which has had health insurance exchanges and mandates since 2006.

"Health reform may have a benefit for doctors," Gans said.

It could mean that doctors may be able to be a little pickier about which insurers to work with.

"You can evaluate the payer mix. Do you have a payer that rejects claims at a higher rate than other payers? Are they slow to pay? This may be an opportunity to choose the contracts you want to renew and what conditions you want to renew them at," Gans said.

Another opportunity is the possibility of providing preventive services that are not always covered now but may be an important part of the final health system reform package.

"Watch carefully what is going to be included," Gans said. "Some proposals include nutritional counseling. Are you set up to do that in your practice? This may be an opportunity for a new practice line, with first-dollar coverage and no co-pays, that could be potentially profitable for the practice."

In addition, since many of the newly insured may have low incomes and get around by public transportation, practices may want to consider opening branches closer to bus and train stops to attract these patients.

Back to top


Business tips from the MGMA conference

Various sessions at the Medical Group Management Assn. meeting in Denver, Oct. 11-14, dealt with ways to help physicians increase their bottom lines. Among the topics:

Payment scales: Establishing scales with various insurers that are a percentage of current or prevailing Medicare payment rates can be dangerous for medical practices, according to one presentation. The strategy can make it easy to compare insurers. But if Medicare rates decline or stay flat, it can lead to a significant decline in revenues from all payers.

"Go back to your offices and find your contracts," said Penny Noyes, president and founder of Health Business Navigators. "And I would be very fearful if you have too many contracts based on Medicare."

Noyes also advocated ensuring that staff understand the bundling rules of various payers, because changing the order of how various services are billed can significantly affect how much money is collected.

Cloud computing: Medical practices struggling to make various electronic medical record systems talk to each other may benefit from "cloud computing" applications. These are software systems that are used through Web browsers and do not have to be downloaded to a practice's computer.

"Cloud computing means you don't have to get into 'does my [EMR] talk to your [EMR],' " said David Nace, MD, vice president for clinical development at McKesson Corp. Its Relay Health division offers cloud computing systems.

Physician-administrator relationships: The most successful practices have a successful working relationship between practice managers and the physicians," said Vicky Bradford, PhD, president of the Bradford Co. in Denver and author of the Total Service Medical Practice. Experts recommended that both parties work to build trust, strengthen communication and develop plans that keep the focus on long-term goals.

Patient visit frequency: Cutting the amount of money spent on medical care annually may require that a small number of patients with chronic conditions be seen more frequently, according to a speech on improving health care.

"High-touch medicine is the future of the physician-patient relationship," said Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, PhD, chair of the Dept. of Bioethics at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health. "We really need to look at that 10% of people with chronic diseases who account for 75% of all health care spending.

This would include scheduling follow-up appointments before patients leave the office, allowing same-day appointments and providing more patient education about specific conditions.

He also said bundled payments, in which physicians are paid for care of an entire illness episode, rather than per service, might also play a role in reducing medical costs.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn