Government

MGMA urges revisions to "meaningful use" guidelines

If accepted by the federal government, the suggested health IT requirements could negatively impact practices and impede EMR adoption, the association says.

By — Posted Dec. 10, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Recommendations before the Obama administration for what constitutes "meaningful use" of electronic medical records could create an undue burden on physician practices if they are not revised by the time federal regulations come out, according to the Medical Group Management Assn.

MGMA sent a Nov. 12 letter to David Blumenthal, MD, national coordinator for health information technology, addressing several concerns it has with the meaningful use guidelines. Dr. Blumenthal and the Health IT Policy Committee recommended objectives for physicians with EMRs to meet by 2011, 2013 and 2015.

The Dept. of Health and Human Services plans to take the guidelines into account when issuing a proposed rule by the end of the year. The final definition ultimately will decide which physicians and hospitals are eligible for billions in federal health IT incentives made available through the most recent economic stimulus package.

While supportive of physician practice adoption of EMRs, MGMA is concerned that committee recommendations may prove too onerous, especially in the first years of implementation. "We believe that an inappropriate definition of meaningful use and inefficient administration of the program will lead to failed implementation ... and result in the needless squandering of resources and significant disruption to the nation's health care system," the association stated.

In its letter to Dr. Blumenthal, MGMA recommended:

  • Instituting a pilot test before the start of the EMR incentive program and before each new phase of implementation.
  • Establishing a system to ensure timely feedback to physicians once meaningful use data are submitted.
  • Including only the criteria that have widespread industry use.
  • Permitting flexibility by avoiding a "pass-fail" approach.
  • Developing a simple process for physicians to attest that they have achieved meaningful use.

The government runs the risk of not fulfilling the stimulus legislation's directive if physicians encounter significant hurdles related to the program, MGMA concluded.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn