business

Conn. doctors left out of Anthem's "most-favored" policy waiver

Hospitals are spared from giving the insurer the same low rates they accept from a state plan. But physicians didn't get the same break.

By Emily Berry — Posted Feb. 17, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Anthem of Connecticut has offered hospitals a waiver that will allow them to accept deeply discounted reimbursement from a state-subsidized public plan without having to give Anthem the same deal.

The step came at the urging of the state's attorney general, Richard Blumenthal, who said his office continues to investigate the use of what are referred to as "most-favored nation" contract clauses.

Such contract terms, which bar a doctor or physician from giving another payer better discounts, are illegal in at least 12 states. They are legal in Connecticut.

Anthem is the Connecticut subsidiary of WellPoint. According to Blumenthal's office and the state medical society, Anthem inserts most-favored-nation language into some contracts with both hospitals and doctors in Connecticut.

Charter Oak Health Plan is a state-subsidized health plan for adults that uses commercial health plan contractors, including Aetna and UnitedHealth Group. Anthem is not one of the contractors. About 13,000 people are enrolled in the program.

According to Blumenthal's office, hospitals were afraid to participate in Charter Oak because they were convinced that Anthem would demand the same rates. The problem diminished the Charter Oak network to the point that in some counties, there were no available network hospitals.

Blumenthal wrote to Anthem in December 2009 to ask the company to assure hospitals that it would not expect discounts equal to those granted to Charter Oak.

On Jan. 28, the attorney general said Anthem had agreed to do so, but physicians were left out of the picture.

"The waiver is specific to hospitals," Anthem spokeswoman Sarah Yeager said in an e-mailed statement.

Matthew Katz, executive vice president at the Connecticut State Medical Society, said the organization has long opposed the use of most-favored-nation clauses and called on Anthem to eliminate their use.

"This is a step in the right direction, but why haven't they released physicians from those terms in their contracts, and why do they have them in the first place?" he said.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn