profession

Prostate cancer screening guidelines updated

Physicians should discuss the risks and benefits of screening with patients, according to recommendations from the American Cancer Society.

By Christine S. Moyer — Posted March 16, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The American Cancer Society has updated its screening guidelines for prostate cancer, emphasizing that doctors educate patients about the potential risks and benefits of screening.

The updated guidelines, published online March 3 in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, keep the society's core recommendations on what age to begin discussions. The main difference from the last ACS guidelines issued in 2001 is the emphasis on informing patients about screening uncertainties and involving patients more in the decision-making process (link).

"With all the evidence we've got, it's increasingly clear that the benefits are uncertain for prostate cancer screening," said Andrew Wolf, MD, lead author of the ACS guidelines and associate professor of medicine at the University of Virginia School of Medicine. "We felt it was time to really emphasize the informed and shared-decision making [approach]."

The cancer society continues to recommend that physicians begin discussing prostate cancer screening with male patients when they are 50 years old. Screening discussions should begin at age 45 for those considered at higher risk for prostate cancer, including blacks and men with a father or brother diagnosed with the disease before age 65.

Men with multiple family members diagnosed with the disease before age 65 should receive screening information at age 40. Patients with less than a 10-year life expectancy, due to age or health status, should not be screened.

Urologist Brantley Thrasher, MD, said the revised guidelines won't likely change how he talks about screening with patients. He said doctors need to ensure adequate dialogue with patients to help them in the decision-making process.

"It basically is echoing what many of us have said for quite some time -- that you need to make sure you're discussing the pros and cons of this with your patients," said Dr. Thrasher, a professor and chair of urology at the University of Kansas Medical Center.

A leading cause of cancer

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among U.S. men and remains the second leading cause of cancer death in males, following lung cancer, according to the ACS. In 2009, about 192,000 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer, with 27,000 expected to die from the disease.

The revised ACS guidelines intend to help physicians detect who is most at risk of dying and who could survive without potentially harmful treatment. To do this, the society updated clinical recommendations on screening intervals.

The ACS recommends men whose PSA level is 2.5 ng/mL or higher be screened annually. For men whose PSA levels are between 2.5 ng/mL and 4.0 ng/mL, physicians are encouraged to consider individual risk factors, including age, ethnicity and family history.

Men at an average risk of developing prostate cancer and who have PSA levels of 4.0 ng/mL or higher should be referred for further evaluation or biopsy.

The guidelines also call for talking to patients about the benefits and harms associated with screening, including false test results and side effects of treatment. The ACS suggests that doctors enhance their discussions with written information or videos with balanced, up-to-date information.

If a patient still can't decide what to do, the screening decision should be left to the physician. That differs from previous ACS guidelines, which said men should be tested if they can't make a decision.

The revised guidelines say men who have had a PSA test do not need a digital rectal exam, because the exam has not clearly shown a benefit.

Physician participation in community-based prostate screening programs, such as those held at health fairs, is discouraged unless the programs adequately provide an informed decision-making process with the patient and appropriate follow-up care. "We're not recommending that all these [community] programs end," Dr. Wolf said. "We're just saying they need to be held to the same standards that physicians are held to."

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn