Maryland high court to address general liability cap

The ruling also could impact statutory award limits in medical liability cases.

By Amy Lynn Sorrel — Posted April 22, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Maryland's high court is set to decide the constitutionality of a general liability cap in a case that likely will impact a separate limit on noneconomic awards in medical liability suits.

The Court of Appeals on April 2 heard oral arguments in a wrongful death case, in which a jury awarded a family $4 million after their 5-year-old son, Connor Freed, drowned in a country club pool in 2006. The trial judge reduced the verdict to $1 million, based on a noneconomic damage cap in general personal injury cases.

The Freeds appealed, contending that the cap violated their equal protection rights, but the Maryland Court of Special Appeals rejected that argument in 2009. Judges cited a nearly 20-year-old high court precedent finding that caps served a legitimate government purpose in making insurance affordable and available and did nothing to restrict access to the courts.

Physicians want to see that precedent stand.

"The concern is, if [the high court] rules that caps are unconstitutional in this action, the next one down the road could be a medical malpractice case to go after the constitutionality of that cap," said Gene M. Ransom III, CEO of MedChi, the Maryland State Medical Society. The organization filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Freed v. DRD Pool Service Inc., joined by the Litigation Center of the American Medical Association and State Medical Societies and the Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society of Maryland, the state's largest medical liability insurer.

Overturning caps would disrupt not only decades-old case law, but also years of stability in Maryland's medical liability environment that has helped keep doctors in practice, Ransom said. Since 2004 -- the last time the Legislature revised the state's medical liability cap to $650,000 -- physicians have seen their liability costs moderate and even inch downward in some areas, he said.

Plaintiff lawyers say rather than helping access to care, such award limits punish injured patients.

"By their very nature, caps are arbitrary and unfair to injured parties, because what you have is [lawmakers] dictating what somebody's injury is worth without hearing the facts of the case. The way our system works is a jury hears the facts of the case and decides the damages," said Wayne M. Willoughby, immediate past president of the Maryland Assn. for Justice. The state trade group for trial attorneys also filed a brief in the case.

Judges have the power to reduce unreasonable awards, Willoughby added, "so there are already checks and balances in place."

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn