profession

Delaying vaccinations won't help child's neurodevelopment

Children vaccinated on time during infancy scored better on two neuropsychological tests than did those whose vaccines were delayed.

By Christine S. Moyer — Posted June 7, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Kentucky pediatricians often ask Michael Smith, MD, a pediatric infectious disease specialist in Louisville, how to address parents' concerns that babies receive too many vaccines too soon.

Some parents choose to delay, or forgo, vaccines because of worries that vaccines given on the recommended schedule could overburden and weaken an infant's immune system and cause neurodevelopmental disorders or other illnesses.

Dr. Smith suggests physicians tell parents that putting off immunizations increases children's risk of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases, which can be fatal. Now he also plans to tell doctors there is no neuropsychological benefit to delaying vaccinations -- a finding from a study he co-authored that was published online in Pediatrics May 24.

"By delaying vaccines, [parents] think it's somehow safer. This study shows it's really not safer, at least in terms of neurodevelopment," said Dr. Smith, study lead author and assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Louisville School of Medicine.

Researchers examined data on 1,047 children who were born between 1993 and 1997 and were part of a previous Vaccine Safety Datalink study on the safety of immunizations with thimerosal.

In 2003 and 2004, the children underwent 42 neuropsychological tests that assessed speech and language, verbal memory, motor coordination, behavior regulation and general intellectual functioning, among other things.

About half of the study participants had received all vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on time during their first year of life. Researchers considered the vaccines on time if they were received within 30 days of the age recommended by the CDC.

Twenty-three percent got vaccines by their first birthday but on a different schedule. Another 20% did not receive all immunizations recommended for the first year. Fewer than 1% received no vaccines during the study period.

Researchers performed two analyses. The first compared children who received vaccines within 30 days of the recommended age to those who had at least one dose delayed. In the second analysis, children who received the most vaccines during their first seven months were compared with those who received the fewest.

No benefits were found for children with delayed vaccines, or for those who received fewer vaccinations than were recommended. In fact, children who were immunized on time scored slightly better on two of the neuropsychological tests, after adjusting for family and socioeconomic factors, than did children whose vaccines were delayed.

The study does not answer "the big question" that parents have about whether there is a difference in long-term health among children who are vaccinated and those who do not receive any immunizations, said Barbara Loe Fisher. She is co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, a nonprofit educational organization based in Vienna, Va.

The CDC recommends that babies receive 18 to 21 doses of 10 vaccines by their first birthdays. The varied dose recommendations are due largely to the requirements of different vaccine brands. For example, children need two or three doses of the rotavirus vaccine, depending on which brand they receive.

Back to top


External links

"On-time Vaccine Receipt in the First Year Does Not Adversely Affect Neuropsychological Outcomes," abstract, Pediatrics, published online May 24 (link)

"Addressing Parents' Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant's Immune System?," abstract, Pediatrics, January 2002 (link)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for 2010 childhood immunization schedule (birth to 6 years old) (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn