profession

Mumps immunity falls below optimal level

The finding comes as the virus resurfaced in 2009 and continues to spread mostly through Orthodox Jewish enclaves in New York and New Jersey.

By Christine S. Moyer — Posted Aug. 25, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A regional mumps resurgence and a lower national immunity in the U.S. mean physicians may be seeing more mumps cases in their sick patients, according to the authors of a new study.

A study published online July 27 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases found that Americans' seroprevalence of antibody to mumps between 1999 and 2004 was below the estimated level of immunity needed to eliminate the illness in the U.S.

The findings come as a resurgence of the virus started in June 2009 and continues to spread largely through Orthodox Jewish communities in New York and New Jersey. More than 1,500 cases have been reported, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The largest mumps outbreak in the U.S. in 20 years occurred in 2006, with 6,584 cases reported, mostly in Midwest states, according to the study. In both outbreaks, a majority of those infected received at least one of the two recommended doses of mumps vaccine.

"Doctors should understand that mumps can still occur [in the U.S.]. If we want to improve population immunity, we should ensure children are appropriately" vaccinated against the disease, said Preeta K. Kutty, MD, MPH, the primary study author and a medical epidemiologist for the CDC.

Cases of the disease should be reported promptly to state health departments, and infected patients should limit interaction with others.

Researchers examined data on 15,383 people age 6 to 49 who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 1999 and 2004. They tested participants' serum for the presence of immunoglobulin G antibody to the mumps virus as a measure of the population's immunity against the disease.

The study found that about 90% of participants had antibody to the mumps virus (link). That figure falls just below the estimated level of immunity (92%) needed to prevent community transmission and outbreaks of the virus, Dr. Kutty said.

Participants born between 1977 and 1998 -- the group with the highest disease incidence during the 2006 outbreak -- had a seroprevalence of about 90%. Among white people, who were more affected than other races during the outbreak, 87.8% had antibodies to mumps.

Participants who were born outside the U.S. had a higher level of seroprevalence (94.7%) than people who were born in the U.S. (89%). Study authors said the finding could reflect a greater circulation of the virus, and thus more exposure to the disease, in foreign countries.

The CDC recommends that physicians administer one dose of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and one dose of the varicella immunization to children 12 to 47 months. Doctors can use the combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine to administer the recommended second dose between 15 months and 12 years.

The MMR vaccine should be given to adults 19 to 53 who lack documentation of vaccination or have no evidence of prior infection. Adults born before 1957 generally are considered immune to measles and mumps. But unvaccinated health professionals born before 1957 should receive two doses of MMR.

Researchers are examining whether a third mumps dose is needed to ensure immunity against the virus, said William J. Bellini, PhD, senior study author and chief of the CDC's Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Herpesvirus Laboratory Branch.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn