business

Doctors, patients agree on how health IT funds should be spent

They say technology can improve the health care system, but differ on where communication gaps exist, a survey finds.

By Pamela Lewis Dolan — Posted Feb. 14, 2011

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A survey finds the public and physicians overwhelmingly agree on how money allocated to advance health information technology should be spent.

The Markle Foundation in January published the results of two surveys it conducted in August 2010 that included more than 1,500 people from the general population and 779 physicians. It found both groups have widespread agreement on how health information technology can improve the health care system. Having buy-in from both is important to advancing health IT, experts say. (See correction)

"From a research perspective we feel it's important to get the views of the public and a representative sample of physicians," said Josh Lemieux, director of personal health technology at the Markle Foundation. Success depends on large numbers of both groups embracing the new technology and implementing it in a way that improves quality and cost-effectiveness and protects privacy, he said.

Lemieux said the survey data made very clear that the public expects benefits from health IT, and it wants data security and privacy protections to be part of the package.

Among the findings was that about 80% of both groups agree it's important to require hospitals and doctors to share information to better coordinate care, cut costs and reduce medical errors. They also agree that progress needs to be measured and goals set to address the nation's chronic health problems.

But the survey found both groups are largely unfamiliar with the federal health IT incentive programs aimed at making the medical records of every American electronic by 2014.

"Education will be an important factor in the success of this program," Lemieux said.

Though patients and physicians agree that health IT could help improve communication between the two groups, they disagree about where the communication gaps exist. Almost all the doctors surveyed said their patients forget, at least sometimes, important things they told them. Twenty-eight percent of patients said they never forget or lose track of information, and 42% said it happens but it's rare.

Similar proportions of patients (40%) and doctors (38%) said patients -- not doctors -- should be responsible for maintaining the most complete and accurate records about themselves.

In addition to health IT priorities, physicians and patients agree that payment reform is necessary to improve the health care system. More than 80% of physicians said they are paid primarily for the quantity of services they provide. About half of both groups say reforming the way doctors are paid is important to improving the health care system.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Health IT spending priorities

A recent survey asked physicians and the public what priorities they thought were important to ensure that health information technology subsidies are well-spent. The survey found overwhelming agreement between the two groups.

Priority Physicians Public
Require data sharing to reduce medical errors 85% 80%
Require data sharing to cut avoidable costs 85% 79%
Require data sharing to better coordinate care 84% 77%
Measure progress on health care quality and safety 73% 75%
Require improvements in heart disease, obesity, diabetes, asthma 69% 69%
Require that patients receive secure online copies of health records 49% 62%

Source: Markle Survey on Health in a Networked Life 2010, "Doctors and Patients Overwhelmingly Agree on Health IT Priorities to Improve Patient Care," January (link)

Back to top


External links

Markle Survey on Health in a Networked Life 2010, "Doctors and Patients Overwhelmingly Agree on Health IT Priorities to Improve Patient Care," January (link)

Back to top


Correction

This story originally gave an incorrect number as to how many physicians completed the Markle survey. The survey included the responses of 779 physicians. American Medical News regrets the error.

Back to top


RELATED CONTENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn