government

Congressional dispute delays 1099 tax reporting repeal

The House and Senate have very different ways of paying for the estimated $20 billion in revenue lost by rolling back the mandate.

By David Glendinning — Posted March 10, 2011

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The House on March 3 overwhelmingly passed legislation that would roll back a tax reporting provision in the health system reform law that would apply to many physician practices. The Senate passed similar legislation in February by a wide margin as part of an unrelated bill, but the chambers are not in agreement over how to offset the cost of the provision's repeal.

The so-called 1099 tax reporting provision, approved to help raise funding for the reform bill's coverage expansions, would require many small businesses to file forms with the Internal Revenue Service for every vendor on which they spend $600 or more in a year. Because many physician practices would be subject to the requirement as well, the American Medical Association and other physician organizations have come out in opposition to the provision and in favor of bipartisan legislation to overturn the language.

Democratic leaders signaled a willingness to rescind the requirement, and President Obama indicated that he would sign legislation to accomplish it. But the two chambers take significantly different approaches to paying for the estimated $20 billion in lost revenue that would occur by rolling back the tax reporting mandate.

The Senate version of the 1099 repeal would give the White House the latitude to redirect money already appropriated by Congress for certain budget items that the administration no longer deems necessary. The House version would require the recipients of federal insurance subsidies under the health system reform law to pay back more of those subsidies if it were determined that the recipients received higher income for the year than projected.

The White House indicated that Obama does not support the House funding mechanism for the 1099 repeal, although the president stopped short of threatening to repeal the House version. At this article's deadline, the House and Senate had not made any apparent progress toward resolving the stalemate.

If it is not rescinded, the tax reporting provision will take effect for purchases starting on Jan. 1, 2012.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn