business

Connecticut governor vetoes hearings on insurance rate hikes

The medical society says the state has failed to become a leader in getting public input on premiums.

By Emily Berry — Posted July 26, 2011

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy has blocked legislation that would have required the state to hold a public "symposium" before approving or rejecting a proposed health insurance rate increase.

The Legislature passed the bill on June 8, but the governor said such a requirement was unnecessary. Malloy said the bill would have been more restrictive than federal guidelines for rate review or any other state's rate regulation, potentially driving away insurers from Connecticut.

"The increased burden and uncertainty caused by these portions of [the bill] that go beyond federal standards [would] likely cause insurers to reduce the number of products they are willing to offer Connecticut residents," Malloy wrote in a message accompanying his veto.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act calls for the federal government to intervene in cases where states do not have a robust rate increase review process. In its final rule published May 23, the Dept. of Health and Human Services noted that despite some calls for routine public hearings on rate hikes, it determined that mandatory hearings would not improve rate oversight.

In July, the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, now part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, released a list of states it considers to have inadequate rate review systems. Connecticut's law was deemed adequate. For the 10 states that HHS considers to have an ineffective system, the CCIIO will review any proposals that represent an average rate increase of 10% or more.

The Connecticut State Medical Society had supported the bill.

"At a time when there is more public interest in legislative and regulatory processes than ever before, Connecticut missed the opportunity to be the leader in public participation in insurance rate review processes and instead has taken a step backward," CSMS Executive Vice President Matthew Katz said in a written statement.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn