CMS: Medicare cancer drug pay not spared from sequestration

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted June 24, 2013

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has clarified that it does not have the authority to exempt cancer treatments for seniors from reduced payments required by federal budget cuts known as sequestration.

A bipartisan group of more than 100 House lawmakers wrote CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner an April 23 letter expressing concern about sequestration and its impact on care for Medicare beneficiaries, including cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The representatives’ letter was sent after a Washington Post article reported that some oncology practices were directing patients elsewhere for care because of rate cuts to expensive physician-administered drugs.

Congress ordered more than $1.2 trillion in automatic cuts to government programs through sequestration in the Budget Control Act of 2011. Medicaid and Social Security were spared from reductions, and decreases in Medicare spending were capped at 2%. The decreased Medicare pay began April 1 and will continue through 2021.

In a recent American Society of Clinical Oncology survey, 80% of respondents said sequestration cuts had affected their practices. Half of those surveyed said they were not able to continue caring for Medicare beneficiaries unless the patients had supplemental insurance. Beneficiaries were being directed to hospital outpatient infusion centers for chemotherapy.

CMS lacks the authority to exempt cancer drugs paid under Medicare Part B from sequestration, Tavenner replied in a June 3 letter to lawmakers. The program typically pays 106% of the average sales price for such doctor-administered drugs. Under sequestration, the program instead will pay 104.3%, according to a theoretical example cited in the letter. Doctors have complained that the rate reduction makes it too costly for practices to purchase and administer the medications themselves.

The American Medical Association has opposed all Medicare cuts resulting from sequestration and has urged Congress to restore full payment rates to physicians.

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn