Government

New Jersey court derails Medicare incentive pay project

Hospitals and CMS are reviewing the ruling to determine the next step.

By Tanya Albert amednews correspondent — Posted May 10, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A federal court in New Jersey put the brakes on a Medicare demonstration project that would have let physicians and hospitals work together to cut health care costs -- while still preserving quality -- and then share in the savings.

The eight New Jersey hospitals chosen for the "Hospital Performance-Based Incentives Demonstration" had lined up physicians to participate. Doctors and hospitals would cut spending through such activities as developing more efficient ways of doing medical and surgical procedures and preventing Medicare patients from getting duplicative services.

The New Jersey Hospital Assn., which applied to test the program, estimated that savings could amount to as much as 25% of Medicare Part B fees at each hospital. Based on the savings, the hospitals would make incentive payments to physicians as a reward for a combination of high quality and efficient care. These awards would be similar to incentives managed care organizations pay.

Three New Jersey hospitals, each part of the Robert Wood Johnson Health System, that were not chosen to participate in the pilot program sued Dept. of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson and other government officials in federal court to expand the project.

"Our goal in bringing this case wasn't to end the demonstration project, but to expand it to other hospitals and doctors throughout the state, improve its design and protect nonparticipating hospitals from an adverse economic impact," said Harvey A. Holzberg, president of Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick and president of the Robert Wood Johnson Health System.

But the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled in late April that the program could not go forward because of concerns that the arrangement violated the 1986 federal civil monetary penalties statute.

The law prohibits hospitals from making a payment, directly or indirectly, to influence a physician to reduce or limit services to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries under the physician's direct care. The law also makes it clear that physicians cannot receive that type of payment.

That's "the very goal and/or inevitable result of the demonstration project," the court said. "Therefore, the demonstration project violates the CMP, and its further implementation will be enjoined."

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which approved the program, noted that the objective is to reduce services without "sacrificing the quality of patient care." But the court said a 1999 HHS Office of Inspector General advisory bulletin on the CMP law underscores that "no combination of features could guarantee such plans would not be subject to abuse."

"Although the secretary now guarantees that the quality of care will not be adversely affected by the financial incentives designed to promote cost efficiency, such a guarantee was previously found by Congress as untenable," the ruling states.

CMS officials should have required the hospitals and physicians to get a full OIG advisory opinion to make sure that the project would not trigger sanctions for violating the CMP law, the judges wrote.

Holding out hope

Spokesmen for the New Jersey Hospital Assn. and CMS said they were reviewing the court's decision to determine their next step.

NJHA spokesman Ron Czajkowski said the opinion leaves open the possibility that the program could go forward if the OIG were to review it and waive any concerns that the arrangement could violate the CMP. The OIG reviewed the original proposal and gave it preliminary approval. But it looks as if the court wants a more thorough OIG review, he said.

The demonstration project's supporters hope it ultimately can take place. "The public could have benefited, the hospitals could have benefited and doctors could have benefited," said Michael Kalison, chair of New Jersey-based Applied Medical Software Inc., which was behind the concept and design. "I'm hopeful that working together with CMS and the OIG, we can address the court's concerns."

Medical Society of New Jersey President Mark T. Olesnicky, MD, said physicians were looking forward to seeing how the project performed. "Anything that could provide patients with good care and save costs is something we support," he said.

Czajkowski added: "We thought there was huge potential here not only for New Jersey, but for the whole country."

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn