UNOS: Don't solicit for cadaveric donation

A transplant ethicist says the agency missed its chance to limit directed organ donations only to family members.

By Andis Robeznieks — Posted Dec. 20, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

From simple classified ads declaring "I need a kidney," to sophisticated Web sites suggesting "You only need one," solicitations for organ donations are capturing the public's attention; but the United Network for Organ Sharing is worried that they may also be compromising the public's faith in the organ allocation system.

That's why, at its meeting last month, the UNOS board adopted a position statement opposing efforts to solicit and direct cadaveric organ donations from strangers to specific individuals. The board cited concerns about fairness and subverting a system designed to allocate organs on the basis of need and usefulness.

"We put a lot of stock in the allocation system," said UNOS ethics committee chair Mark D. Fox, MD, PhD. "No, it's not perfect, but it's equitable, and we're all striving to get it right."

The statement noted that UNOS "opposes any attempt by an individual transplant candidate (or his/her representatives) to solicit organ donation from a deceased donor ahead of other waiting candidates in a manner that subverts the established principles and objectives of equitable organ allocations."

It also encouraged people considering public appeals to promote the general need for organs and not to direct a donation to a specific individual.

"Organ allocation isn't a popularity contest," said Dr. Fox, a physician ethicist at the University of Oklahoma College of Medicine in Tulsa.

Dr. Fox, an internist and pediatrician, said well-intentioned friends and relatives who solicit on behalf of a patient on the organ waiting list fail to view the big picture.

"They say 'Our friend wouldn't be alive if we hadn't done this,' and I can understand that point of view," he said. "But our focus is on the 87,000 people on the waiting list, and their focus is on one person."

Dr. Fox said the position statement is meant to guide organizations in the UNOS network.

He said that, although UNOS opposes advertising for directed cadaveric donations, the ads are constitutionally protected free speech, so UNOS has no power to ban them.

Although the First Amendment may permit advertising for organs, Sheldon Zink, PhD, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Program for Transplant Policy and Ethics, said UNOS missed a chance to say directed donations should only be allowed between family members.

"I don't think it resolved anything," she said. "I thought [the statement] was extremely soft, and I was surprised that the board didn't rise to the occasion with something more."

Robert Sade, MD, a member of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs and a former member of the UNOS ethics committee, said the AMA doesn't have an official position on public solicitation or directed donation. He added that the UNOS statement does include a "problematic" assumption: That public solicitation for directed donations has a negative impact on the supply of organs.

"As far as I know, no one has looked at this," Dr. Sade said. "It's plausible that directed donations have no effect. And, if donors would have donated anyway, then there's an equity problem."

But, if directed donations are increasing the supply of organs, he said some may view that positively despite the apparent inequities it may create.

Dr. Zink, however, said these apparent inequities are also capturing public attention. She said she has noticed a growing backlash against people like Todd Krampitz of Houston, whose successful advertising campaign for a new liver this summer has spawned many imitators.

"At first, he was this nice guy who needed a liver, but then they turned on him and now say he jumped in line," she said.

Dr. Fox said these are issues the ethics panel has considered. He added that there is talk of limiting live organ donations to those between people who have an established relationship, but defining what that means is difficult.

He said these relations could include family members, co-workers or members of the same church. But then he said questions could arise about churches with large congregations where the donor and recipient don't even know each other.

"What kind of relationship matters? Fellow Democrat or NASCAR fan?" he asked. "That's something we're struggling with."

Dr. Fox said his "worst nightmare" would be counter-advertising with billboards saying to potential donors: "Don't give Andy your liver."

Back to top

External links

United Network for Organ Sharing position statement and press release announcing opposition to solicitations for cadaveric organ donations to be directed to specific individuals (link)

American Society of Transplant Surgeons' statement on solicitation of donor organs, Nov. 11 (link)

Web site soliciting kidney donation (link)

Todd Krampitz Web site (link)

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn