Cost cutting gets creative: How managed care works in 2005
■ Health plans are tweaking details and offering small bonuses to enlist doctors in programs to cut expenses in the name of improving care.
By Robert Kazel — Posted Feb. 28, 2005
For the managed care industry, a funny thing happened on the way to cost-control and quality-improvement initiatives: Insurers discovered they need to reach out to physicians -- in a big way, and in many ways.
While HMO efforts in the 1990s to trim medical costs might be symbolized by a clenched fist cautioning doctors to toe the line, a metaphor for cost-cutting strategies in 2005 would be a hand beckoning doctors to join, to participate, to innovate. Not surprisingly, physicians also are being asked to drop their view of managed care as synonymous with control, manipulation and interference.
Insurers this year will introduce, test or expand strategies that aim to cut medical spending in many ways, and most will rely on the enthusiasm and good will of doctors to realize their goals. Plans are rolling out these programs, including new disease-management initiatives, pay-for-performance incentives and redesigned insurance products, as a means of appeasing employers that refuse to take rising insurance costs in stride.
"Traditional managed care tactics have been exhausted," says Ed Kaplan, national practice leader for the Segal Co. in New York.
The following are some cost-reduction initiatives, to be stepped up by plans and payers, that many physicians will see taking shape this year.
Disease management reaches outward
Many doctors in the past have viewed disease-management programs with suspicion. They see them as imposed by health plans, sometimes with less-than-scientific research backing them up. Some doctors resent them because these programs typically have contacted plan subscribers directly, leaving doctors feeling left out. In some cases, paperwork has just been onerous.
Now, however, top disease-management companies are saying that initiatives for 2005 will appeal to medical practices to join them in a more central role. "The disease-management programs are finding that to be more successful, they need to partner much more effectively with the physicians," says Sandeep Wadhwa, MD, a vice president with San Francisco-based McKesson Corp., a national disease-management contractor.
Instead of solely using nurses working out of remote call centers, disease-management firms will increase the use of locally based representatives to visit practices to speak with the doctors or staffs about how to help patients and "what the key barriers to adherence [to disease-management standards] are," Dr. Wadhwa says.
Aside from pursuing their customary patient-education goals, he says, some disease-management programs in 2005 will begin to link more directly to quality-management programs that monitor physician performance, making use of disease-management data to award health plan bonuses.
To help get doctors' support, any new initiatives will seek to avoid being a burden on doctors' time and creating "a backlash against paper" that can occur when physicians feel overwhelmed by bureaucratic demands on their time, he says.
"We want more participation with doctors without new operational burdens," says Robert Stone, executive vice president and chief strategy officer of American Healthways, a Nashville, Tenn.-based disease-management company.
Doctors also can expect to see new disease-management programs this year in areas such as cancer, depression and obesity.
CIGNA Corp. in February said it planned to introduce a comprehensive disease-management program to fight obesity, which will use data mining to detect patients with hypertension, high cholesterol, unhealthy blood sugar levels and other problems associated with being overweight. The plan says the program will be offered to employers this year and rolled out in 2006.
Pay for performance: Eagerness or apathy
More health plans and employer coalitions this year will introduce pay-for-performance programs that attempt to gauge, and reward, physician quality or efficiency or both, industry experts say. But few such programs exist on a large scale, and many new programs making headlines in 2005 will be tests aimed at seeing how strongly physicians respond, says Dan Roble, a Boston health care attorney affiliated with the Leapfrog Group, a consortium of Fortune 500 companies and other health care purchasers.
Physicians who treat patients enrolled in Pittsburgh-based Highmark's PPO plans, for example, will be able to get incentive payments for the first time this year, whereas before, only doctors treating HMO members were eligible. As many as 6,000 Highmark network physicians are expected to volunteer for the pay-for-performance initiative by the end of next year.
Meanwhile, Medicare is planning to begin testing pay-for-performance at 10 large physician groups.
It's not clear how many doctors will decide that the bonus criteria selected by plans have nothing to do with "reducing care" and agree to opt in. Much uncertainty still exists, too, about whether the quality measurement tools employed by pay-for-performance programs can be meaningfully adapted to measure what doctors do, particularly at practices of modest size, says Peter Kongstvedt, MD, a Vienna, Va.-based health industry consultant and vice president of Capgemini Health.
"Pay for performance can be done reasonably well at the hospital level, and it's OK for large medical groups and big IPAs," he says. "It's almost impossible to do it at the level of individual physicians, because chance has more to do with [outcomes] than anything else."
Furthermore, although more initiatives are debuting, getting doctors to move toward pay-for-performance programs could take some coaxing in the next year. The potential bonuses for ideal performance are fairly small and might not seem worth the extra trouble and technological investment, says Uwe Reinhardt, PhD, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University who specializes in health issues.
"The amount of pay differential in the U.S. between someone with high performance and low performance is a matter of 5% to 10%," he says. "American payers who talk about pay-for-performance are like drunk lovers at a bar -- big talk, little follow-through."
More health insurers will roll out consumer-directed insurance plans this year, which count on patients to be more active in their care by being aware of treatment options and costs.
Some of these new plans will center around health savings accounts, or HSAs, which permit tax-advantaged funds to be set aside by an individual subscriber or employee for any medical expenses. Further coverage in the form of a standard PPO plan can be tapped once a high deductible, sometimes as much as $5,000, is reached. During the "bridge" period between the time that funds in the HSA are exhausted and the deductible is reached, the patient pays for health care expenses out of pocket -- although the practice might not realize this at the time of care.
This could complicate matters for physicians as they see more patients enroll in such plans. More billing and collection activity might be needed to cope with gradually mounting accounts receivable. These difficulties haven't been visible to many practices yet but could become more apparent in 2005, experts say.
Brad Engel, national health and welfare product leader for Mellon Bank, says the successful integration of physician practices, insurance databases and online payment systems associated with HSAs and other consumer-directed plans ideally will head off any "physician eruption" of discontent that might occur over a rise in collection hassles. He says 2005 will be "a real bellwether year" in establishing those connections.
One development that will begin to aid doctors and patients, experts say, will be the increasing introduction of debit cards tied to HSAs for instant payments to doctors and hospitals, Engel says. This month, the Chicago-based BlueCross and BlueShield Assn. approved the issuance of "Blue"-branded debit cards for HSA participants, as well as patients enrolled in flexible spending accounts and health reimbursement accounts.
For now, however, practices will need to be attentive to patients who have HSAs or similar accounts to be certain where their reimbursement will be coming from, says Mike Barrett, president of Health Systems Direct, a managed care consulting firm in Orlando, Fla. "I think it's perfectly legitimate for a doctor to say, 'Do you have an HSA, and if so, have you met your deductible -- and do I bill you or your insurance company?' " he says.
Consumer-directed plans haven't yet caught the attention of many doctors, according to Bradley Kupferberg, executive director of the Faculty Practice Plan at Chicago's Children's Memorial Hospital, a group of 280 specialists. But he is optimistic about HSAs and says his group would find the need for collections no more onerous than hounding private insurers or public agencies for payment, as it does now every day.
"It's easier to chase a person than it is to deal with insurance companies or the government, through Medicaid," he says. "It will be just a shifting of [collection] resources."