Health
Paucity of information raised HIV fear factor
■ A quarter century of knowledge boosts doctors' ability to treat this disease.
By Victoria Stagg Elliott — Posted June 12, 2006
- WITH THIS STORY:
- » AIDS demographics by the numbers
- » Timeline of an epidemic
- » Care evolves
- » External links
- » Related content
In the mid-1980s, newspapers were filled with stories about a new virus, and the medical profession was wrestling with how to handle some physicians' refusals to treat those infected.
"AIDS had just arrived on the scene. It proved to be a fatal disease with no known treatment, and it was not clear how contagious it was," said Russel Patterson, MD, vice chair of the AMA's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs in 1987, when the panel issued a statement that physicians had an ethical obligation to care for people with AIDS.
In hindsight, physician reluctance is blamed primarily on lack of information. The risk health care workers faced of possibly contracting the virus had a chilling effect. The stigma of homosexuality accompanying AIDS, as well as doctors' discomfort with discussions about sex that were a crucial part of related counseling, also contributed to the hesitancy.
A survey of general internists, family physicians and general practitioners published in the Nov. 27, 1991, Journal of the American Medical Association found that a majority of doctors felt they had a responsibility to treat patients who were HIV-positive or who had AIDS, though half said they would opt out if given the choice. A third were uneasy around homosexuals, and more than half responded that they preferred not to have injection drug users in their practice.
"At the beginning of the epidemic, a lot of physicians were not comfortable treating people with HIV," said Barbara Gerbert, PhD, lead author and chair of the division of behavioral sciences at the University of California, San Francisco. "Doctors were having trouble talking to patients about sex. [They] were also very worried about [their own health] and we were doing a bad job of reassuring them."
Twenty-five years later, HIV and AIDS are part of mainstream medical practice. Several studies have found that, even in states where prevalence is low, between two-thirds and three-fourths of primary care physicians treat patients with HIV. A significant percentage of these doctors provide all the medical services the patient needs.
"HIV has become much more ordinary," said Ronald Epstein, MD, professor of family medicine at the University of Rochester in New York.
The reasons are multiple. First, the transmission risk to health care workers was addressed, largely through the development of infection-control protocols. Second, more can now be done for those with the disease. Additionally, the geography and demography of those testing positive has expanded.
"It's changed a lot over the years," said Dr. Patterson. "We know much more about AIDS. You really need to work at it to get it. It can be treated, and it turns out that all kinds of people can get AIDS for all sorts of reasons."