Government

NIH lifts main stem cell funding restriction

Federal money now will be available for research on new and existing stem cell lines from embryos donated under strict guidelines.

By Doug Trapp — Posted July 20, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

New, less-restrictive regulations have opened the door to millions of dollars in federal funding for a wider range of human embryonic stem cell research.

The National Institutes of Health on July 6 unveiled final rules allowing research on stem cells derived from embryos specifically donated for that purpose by fertility clinic patients. Funding also will be available for research on privately created stem cell lines that meet the NIH ethical donation guidelines. President Bush's August 2001 executive order had banned federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research on all but the approximately 20 viable cell lines that had already been derived.

The new NIH regulations still carry some restrictions. For instance, they continue to prohibit federal funding for research on stem cells derived from cloned embryos. The rules took effect July 7.

Scientists and other experts said that even with the restrictions, the NIH rules are a significant step forward. Investigators have been relying on state and private funding. Allowing federal funding for work on existing lines is crucial to preserving the last several years of research, said Mark O. Lively, PhD, president of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

Fertility clinic patients have been eager to have the freedom to donate embryos they no longer need as a way to advance research, said R. Dale McClure, MD, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine's president.

The society's spokesman, Sean B. Tipton, said he didn't think the NIH's written, informed consent requirements would discourage embryo donations or burden fertility clinics. "It's such an improvement over what federal policy had been," he said.

Patient advocates also expressed relief. "This will allow research that has been stifled for years to move forward," said Amy Comstock Rick. She is president of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, a group of more than 100 patient advocacy organizations.

Although NIH is receiving about $8 billion in stimulus funding for research grants, Lively expected most of that money to go toward unfunded grant requests received by NIH in 2008. NIH spokesman Don Ralbovsky could not say how much stimulus funding would go toward stem cell research.

Disappointment on both sides

Embryonic stem cell research remains deeply controversial. NIH received more than 49,000 comments in response to the draft rules issued April 23, but it rejected about 30,000 of them because they addressed whether -- not how -- such research should be conducted, Ralbovsky said.

NIH could have permitted funding for embryos made specifically for research, but it chose not to take that step. "I'm sure that disappointed some scientists," said Tom Murray, president and CEO of the Hastings Center, an independent bioethics research institute.

One disappointed scientist is Irving L. Weissman, MD, PhD, who directs Stanford University's Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. He sees potential in deriving stem cell lines by transferring genetic material from a patient's regular cells to an egg cell, a process known as somatic cell nuclear transfer or therapeutic cloning. "Instead, their only justification for not funding research on these lines was that SCNT didn't have public support."

Still, FASEB spokeswoman Carrie Wolinetz, PhD, said she wasn't aware of any stem cell lines that had been produced using alternative methods such as SCNT.

Lively said the final stem cell rule shows how carefully NIH considered the issue. "The conservative approach they are taking is just indicative of the fact that they want to get it right."

Others decried the change. For the first time in the nation's history, human embryos will be destroyed in the course of NIH-funded projects, said William Hurlbut, MD, a consulting professor of neuroscience at Stanford University and a former member of President George W. Bush's Council on Bioethics. "It's a radical step to do what is being done."

Dr. Hurlbut expects the Obama administration to propose further expansions of stem cell research. "This is not over. ... This is the first chapter in a long story."

The NIH stem cell funding guidelines are available online (link).

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Stem cell rules seek middle ground

Key Bush administration restrictions on embryonic stem cell research -- but not all limits -- were lifted by final National Institutes of Health guidelines that took effect July 7. The NIH guidelines continue to prohibit federal funding for research that:

  • Uses human embryonic stem cells from embryos other than those donated by fertility clinics and that otherwise would have been discarded.
  • Uses cells from embryos created solely for research purposes.
  • Involves embryos derived from other methods, such as therapeutic cloning.
  • Involves embryos from donors who were compensated or who failed to give consent in writing.
  • Introduces human stem cell lines into non-human primate blastocysts or influences the genetic lines of animals.
  • Violates the Dickey Amendment, which prohibits research on human embryos themselves.

Source: National Institutes of Health, July link

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn